On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, comex wrote: > My mistake, I zoop a criminal case against myself alleging that I > violated Rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to > register with the same basis as another player. (To be clear, this > means I intend to initiate the case, then act on behalf of Sgeo and > ehird, in order, to support it, then initiate the case with 2 > support.)
A lot of the success or failure of this scam is based on the CotC's timing: e.g. an appeal could go through immediately while this case remained unassigned for nearly a week, or vice versa. So before I decide whether to "fight" this, CotC Murphy, your opinion? -Goethe
