On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think these are big enough cons, you really want round-robin multiple > rounds. I don't think you have to worry too much about assembly, etc., > you're probably offering enough diversity if you offer a small range of > standard programming languages. It might be better to just get this > off the ground by "adding languages by request where possible", you > shouldn't end up with too many? I think that works, thanks! I'll look into establishing a general framework in the next few days, though converting that into a workable program will have to wait a bit. So, I was wrong in my assumption, then, that you could compile a program written in essentially any language into some sort of executable file that could be run anywhere? BP
