On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 12:30 -0500, comex wrote: > We really need a Notary. I'm tired of having to search through old > reports-- Agora's stint with a web-accessible Notary site was highly > productive. > > I could take on the office but I'd rather not. Alternatively, I'm > contemplating initiating a set of criminal cases against the parties > to some contracts (Werewolves, Protection Racket) for failing to keep > the Notary informed as to their text and set of parties... this > failure being the reason that ais523 and ehird quit in the first > place. In theory, it's impossible to not inform the Notary for a public contract, as changes have to be published. On the other hand, repeatedly publishing diffs, rather than the whole contract can lead to all sorts of trouble. (Maybe we should have a rule that the entire text and membership has to be published when changing a public contract? Most popular public contracts do that anyway as part of the report, so it's not that much of a burden, and would be informative.)
-- ais523
