On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 17:09 -0500, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On 15 Dec 2008, at 18:00, Alex Smith wrote:
> >
> >> (Assuming you can't somehow leverage your dictatorship to stop it
> >> passing in the first place...)
> >
> > of course we can.
> 
> How do you suppose?  It's been judged that annotations don't work, and
> that the democratization did work; neither was appealed.  We passed a
> useless scam proposal.

It's also been judged that democratisation didn't stop the original scam
passing; and I thought the annotations-don't-work judgement was
appealed?
-- 
ais523

Reply via email to