On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> "and SHOULD be used when a rule includes a term otherwise." -- MMI
>
> Has this specific aspect of the First Speaker rule been thought about before?
>
> CFJ: { Michael Norrish is obligated to be Michael Norrish }
Using SHOULD in R104 would just mean that, if the Speaker of the First Game
was *not* Michael Norrish, it would violate R104.
But e was, so it didn't.
Or it means it continuously ("the Speaker for the First game SHALL forever
more be considered to have been Michael Norrish") so any future legal claim
that e wasn't would so violate.
-Goethe
