On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:02 PM, comex <com...@gmail.com> wrote: > As the existence of the contestmaster attribute does not depend on the > contract, dependent actions whose effects would include changing a > contest's contestmaster are not possible.
Contestmaster is a contract switch. Of course its existence depends on the contract; without the contract there's no switch. In any case, I don't believe there are any existing contracts that provide a dependent-action-based contestmaster switching mechanism, so even if making dependent actions in contracts part of the rules instead of a "we know what it means even though they're not *really* dependent actions" thing broke something, it didn't affect any actual contracts.
