ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:47 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: >> comex wrote: >> >>> I create 7 E notes in the AFO's possession. This fails, because the >>> AFO is not a player. Oh well. >> I'm surprised you didn't re-register the AFO while you were at it. > > The AFO doesn't really work if any of its partners don't want it to > play, I wouldn't reregister it without your permission. (I don't know > how comex feels on this, though.)
I don't object to the AFO becoming re-registered.
