comex wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Dvorak Herring > <dvorak.herr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Wouldn't the following fail: >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: >>> Without objection, I make Billy Pilgrim inactive. >>> Without objection, I make j inactive. >>> Without objection, I make cmealerjr inactive. >> because rule 1728 requires: > > Intent was announced a week and change ago under the subject "BUS: The > quorum is way too high."
Yeah, the usual phrasings are "Without objection, I intend to do X" and "Having received no objections, I do X" but these exact wordings are not mandated.
