comex wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> 4) The distribution of a proposal is a point-worthy event (counting >> at most 5 proposals per author per week) for the X axis. > > Huh? So distributions are counted only if they have at least one > non-excess proposal?
Each proposal in a batch is a separate event. >> 5) The initiation of a judicial case is a point-worthy event >> (counting at most 5 proposals per initiator per week) for the >> Y axis. > > *case. Seems too easy to game, IMO. The 5 case limit prevents it > from being very easily gamed, but a guess of 6 CFJs, say, will be > correct most weeks if you call the difference in spam cases before the > end. Even with multiple contestants capable of gaming it? I considered withdrawing my agreement and re-posting with a AAA-style "contestants SHALL NOT submit spam proposals / cases", but let's see how it plays out as is.
