On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 09:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I vote FOR Proposal 6165 and AGAINST proposal 6166 (not because of lack of > trust of comex-as-rulekeepor, but because I never thought ruleset > ratification > was a good idea to begin with...ratify everything else but let the rules be > corrected when need be). -Goethe
Well, the problem is that a long-standing rules problem may break the rest of ratification. (For instance, if the rules don't say what we think they do, the ratification rules may be completely broken.) That way, we could end up with a really large massive gamestate recalculation unless the rules are ratified, preferably without dependencies on anything but the proposal rules. On the other hand, I don't really like ratifying the rules while there are so many scam warnings in them... -- ais523
