On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > Now, some facts, followed by actions. > > 1. Deputizing for an office and performing the duty does not take away > the obligation for the officer to do that duty. Therefore, a person > can deputize multiple times to perform the same duty (recent precedents).
Which precedents? In CFJ 2406 I submitted a judgement which implies that multiple deputisation is not possible (in this case, the open-ended obligation for the Speaker to assign prerogatives was fulfilled when Goethe deputised the first time; although e is not Speaker, we pretend e is speaker for the purpose of that action so, at that moment, 'the Speaker' did indeed assign prerogatives) and it wasn't appealed. What am I missing?
