2009/4/28 Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com>:
> Proposal: Reworking the Anarchist (AI = 1, II = 3)
>
> The Anarchist's proposals are rarely accepted. This proposal proposes two
> changes, both of which serve the purpose of having the Anarchist's proposals
> actually be accepted. First, the Anarchist is given the power to select the
> rules e wishes to repeal rather than having to randomly select some (which
> will often net em with having rules that nobody wants to repeal). Second, it
> gives the Anarchist the power to submit other relevant changes, so as not to
> leave the rules in disarray if any of eir proposals are to be accepted.
> These changes should dramatically increase the adoption rate of the
> Anarchist's proposals.
>
> Amend Rule 2216 (The Repeal-o-Matic) to read:
>
>       The Anarchist is an office; its holder is responsible for
>       proposing the repeal of rules.
>
>       The Anarchist's weekly duties include picking one or more rules
>       and submitting proposals to repeal those rules. The Anarchist
>       SHOULD include in eir proposals other relevant changes so as not
>       to break the rule set. The Anarchist SHALL NOT submit a proposal
>       to repeal a rule for which e already submitted a proposal to
>       repeal within the last month. The adoption index of each of the
>       Anarchist's proposals is equal to the maximum power of the rule
>       e is to amend.
>
> End Proposal
>
As the Anarchist, I endorse this change. It's always felt like
something I did just for the sake of doing it.

-- 
-Tiger

Reply via email to