Goethe wrote: > Actually you're right. This doesn't work in that it means one could litigate > perfectly legal backstabbing, reducing someone else's caste, etc. which we > don't want. I think a more appropriate way would be to say that: > > "After a finding of Guilty, in place of a Sentence, an equity settlement > could be imposed [with appropriate safeguards]."
The intended use case is to litigate legal but unintended things, like coppro and root's recent win causing others to lose points, or R2125 inflating the severity of a Power=1 "X MAY Y only if Z". If an equity judge deviates from that IMO reasonable standard, then that's what appeals are for.
