On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Dvorak Herring <dvorak.herr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Submission for "Scamster-for-a-day": > Change the power of Rule 2228 below 1.7 thus not allowing it to secure Rests > at power 1.7. This would cause rests to be unsecured allowing one to create > and destroy rests at will.
"Unsecured" doesn't mean arbitrarily changeable at will. It would just mean there would be no minimum power requirement for a mechanism for changing it. -root
