On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 12:37 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > Pavitra wrote: > > > I disagree, and I not-support the intent. Judge comex assigned judgement > > on time, thus making the judgement an on-time judgement; Murphy then > > published that on-time judgement by (re)posting it to a public forum. > > The judgement does not become late simply by Murphy's quoting it. > > It was on-time wrt comex; its on-time-ness is undefined wrt me. What if > comex re-published it during the following week? (Tiger's fix proposal > would also fix that situation, of course.)
Yet more fun: suppose a player publishes a judgement within the 72 hours after a Holiday, and the case was assigned to them over a week beforehand. Is that on time? -- ais523
