comex wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Taral <tar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I see this proposal not as a way for me to be a jackass, but to reveal a >>> part of the game as flawed. Scamming is something that is very intricate in >>> the game, and as a result it should be expected that someone would submit a >>> proposal like this. Instead of getting angry at the proposal, change the >>> rules to make the proposal impossible. I don't see how this scam is >>> different from any other. >> This scam deregisters people. > > How is that any different from, say, inactivating people, or making > contracts contests? It's all switches and flipping. It causes em to lose all eir assets, for one.
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Taral
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Aaron Goldfein
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Aaron Goldfein
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Taral
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Domin... comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative D... Sean Hunt
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative D... Taral
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Domin... Aaron Goldfein
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Domin... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative D... Taral
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislat... Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legi... Charles Walker
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: ... Jonatan Kilhamn
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: ... Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislat... Quazie
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Sean Hunt