On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: >> There are currently at least two or three endorsements of Wooble in >> the Tailor election. I would ask those endorsers to vote conditionally >> if Wooble does not, I would encourage Wooble to vote, and I would >> encourage the Wielder to rubberstamp it. > > OTOH, as long as I don't vote a vote endorsing me is effectively a > vote for me, and maybe some of the voters no longer think I should be > replaced since my horrible attempted behavior was, fortunately, > IMPOSSIBLE. >
Ah, you're right, I was conufsing this with the Assessor election, which is regarding a vacant office and thus needs to be completed; whereas the resolution of this election is relatively immaterial.
