On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:52, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by inserting the following new > paragraph immediately after the paragraph in which the above > deletion occurred: > > If the time period ends with no majority judgement, then: > - if the Justiciar has published an opinion on the case > clearly marked as the Justiciar's Opinion and indicating > a valid judgement, and that judgement is the same as > one given by at least panel member (other than the
I think you missed "one" in the last line quoted above. BobTHJ
