On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >>> Of course, in terms of "shortest lurk time", Michael will always win. >>> -G. >> >> Not really. I received a grand total of 0 game messages before registering. > > I assume you were subscribed for a positive finite time?
Lurk time could be defined in number of messages viewed whilst inactive and/or a non-player. or Lurk time could be defined as a positive finite duration of time where said lurker is inactive and/or a non-player. Depending on which it is, *you are both right. *NOT Luke Lockhart. Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
