On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Geoffrey Spear<geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > I personally believe...
I appeal based on the following: R1727 points out that the game was not called Agora until much later, which goes against the "Agora began on June 30th, 1993" argument. R104 does cause Michael to be the first speaker, but that does not mean that the game began when it first had a speaker. The game could have existed without a speaker, and without rules for that matter, until Michael proposed and unanimously (because it was merely adopted them) adopted the "initial" ruleset on June 30th, 1993. R2158 states "A judge SHOULD NOT assign an inappropriate judgement to any judicial question. A judgement is valid and/or appropriate only as defined by the rules," which personal beliefs on when the world began are not defined by the rules. Additionally, CFJ 1871's conclusion in which Judge Zefram states "If a judge makes an appropriate judgement but with poor reasoning, this is an unsatisfactory situation that requires remedy." Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
