2009/6/9 Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com>: > Tiger wrote: > >> Okay, so I've run into a problem. The report published on 19 May has >> self-ratified. Some monthly duties for May were performed in the time >> between 1 and 17 May, earned notes for their performers at that time >> (incorrectly). So Herald Gravity, Notary ais523 and Rulekeepor comex >> have notes for their monthly reports already, through ratification, >> but haven't actually been awarded them since it didn't happen when I >> first said it did. So they'll get notes twice. Any suggestion on how >> to solve this (including, but not limited to, making sure I get what I >> deserve and making sure notes aren't given away twice)? > > Submit a proposal enacting corrections. > > Publish another report reflecting what note holdings would be if you > hadn't made these mistakes, dodging Rule 2143 with a disclaimer along > the lines of "the accuracy of this report may depend on having it > self-ratify", then see if everyone lets it self-ratify (I've done this > in the past). Or resign the office, then deputise for it to publish a > corrective report (this may dodge R2143 depending on how R2160's "as if > e held [the] office" is interpreted, though I suspect not). Or just > resign the office, having acknowledged these mistakes, and let your > successor decide whether to do anything about it (I did this with > Insulator and the error has yet to be reversed). > This turned out to not be a problem since it never ratified. But thanks for the tips.
-- -Tiger
