Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
>
>> Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>>> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>>> Ed Murphy wrote:
>>>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2544a
>>>> I opine REASSIGN. REMAND would normally be appropriate in this
>>>> situation, however, the case now has an interest index higher than the
>>>> former judge's judicial rank; a reassignment does not seem logical.
>>>>
>>> REASSIGN, because of; clearly, so it follows that and therefore.
>> I transfer a prop from Rodlen to Pavitra because.
>>
>> (note to the ATC: there is a reason here that should be reasonably be
>> inferred. I believe the transfer is successful).
>
> No, sorry, your reason for choosing Pavitra is reasonably obvious
> but your reason for choosing Rodlen is not.
The reason is that Rodlen was the original judge in the case who
provided the bad arguments.
