On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 13:09, Roger Hicks<pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:32, Alex Smith<ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> >>> Er, here's the alternate one - currently just finishing up the card >>> definitions. >>> ais523, how do you want to proceed, pick one or merge? >> >> Probably best to pick yours, as it's more mature, and then merge in a >> few features of mine. In particular, I'd like to see salaries reduced >> the more cards someone is holding at the time (such as via topping >> players up to a set number of cards, rather than via creating them). My >> proto also replaces Caste with cards, whereas yours doesn't; whereas >> yours replaces MWoP with cards, whereas mine doesn't. Maybe we could do >> both. >> > I'm liking Goethe's proposal, but I agree with ais523....cards should > replace caste as well. I've secretly hated caste from the get-go - > it's too limiting. > > BobTHJ > Also, while I agree with ais523 that there should be a maximum hand size (to keep from having to track hundreds of cards for inactive players) I think that hand size should be set much higher than eir proposal suggested....paticularly if there will be many cards which grant abilities simply by holding them. I'm thinking something in the range of 15-30....and possibly adjustable by some mechanism.
BobTHJ
