Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>>Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 15:12, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>>>> Unless someone else joins, the LPRS will only be a person for the next
>>>> week, so I won't bother re-intending intending registration.
>>>>
>>> I join the LPRS.
>>
>>I intend, with the majority consent of {coppro, C-walker, BobTHJ}, to
>>cause the LPRS to intend with Agoran Consent to register.
>>
>>Pavitra
>
> Checked the short and full rulesets, and I can't find it anywhere. What is
> the LPRS?
>
> compsciguy
It's a contract. It's not in the rulesets because it's defined in the
private sector. It's one instance of a recurring attempt to
non-legislatively get around the Rules saying that points can't be
transferred.
Proposal 6380, if it passes, should make the whole thing irrelevant.
