On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 19:47 -0400, comex wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following incorrect document:
> { The office of Grand Poobah is empty. There are no ongoing elections
> for the office of Grand Poobah or decisions to determine a new
> officeholder for that office. }
>
> The document is incorrect because coppro is the Grand Poobah, and
> there may or may not be an ongoing election/decision. It might be a
> nice subject for CFJ, but I'd like to get a real Poobah into offce
> without wasting any more time, especially if G.'s purported decision
> initiation turns out to have been platonically invalid.
>
> I intend, with support, to initiate an election for Grand Poobah.
> (This is ineffective now, but the ratification will retroactively
> validate it.)
>
I still believe G. is the Grand Poobah. I suspect I've missed some of
the arguments to the contrary; will someone please point me to them?
If we really want to end the ambiguity, then G. can resign and coppro
can take the office as Default Officeholder. That may not be the best
way out of the issue, though.
--
ais523
