Sean Hunt wrote: > Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> Sean Hunt wrote: >>> My specific complaints are as follows: >>> >>> - The IBA does not have a functioning offer system as it cannot >>> platonically act on behalf of a player. >>> - The Rates of assets have not been kept updated. >>> - The President has not recently published a report. >> >> The IBA is mostly inactive. If no one puts in an IBA-proposal to fix the >> first two of these by the time judgement is delivered, then terminating >> the contract would be equitable. >> >> Pavitra > I disagree. The first is not fatal to the contract. The zm exchange > mechanism, while diminished in usefulness without an offer system, is > still useful. I would have used it today with my AAA crops were it not > for the fact that a report had not been published.
My reasoning is that if no party even attempts a fix, then that would indicate that no one cares about the contract enough to bother with it. Your earlier-today desire to use it notwithstanding, I still hold by that line of reasoning. Sure, a working bank would be nice; but any one of us may or may not want it *strongly enough* to actually do anything about it.
