coppro wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: >> coppro wrote: >> >>> You should also feel HUMILIATED if you didn't vote in this >>> QUORUM-FAILING election! Especially if you missed the second, correct >>> announcement and so got your vote dropped! HUMILIATION! >> What was quorum for this election, and for the Tailor election, and >> why? Based on recent proposal resolutions, the baseline has been 6 >> lately, but there may have been rubberstamping or something that I >> haven't been paying attention to. >> > The eligible voters for an election are the active players; unlike > proposal Decisions, this set is not fixed at initiating time. As a > result, quorum is currently 6. > > There is currently no means to change quorum on an election.
So how did you resolve quorum-failing elections? Did the extended voting periods already expire?
