Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>>> 2009/8/28 Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com>:
>>>> (If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else (not Y))
>>>
>>> Jesus
>>> flippin'
>>> Christ
>>> on
>>> a
>>> pogo
>>> stick
>>> Please tell me this was a typo.
>>
>> It's true for CANs on regulated things because the default state is not Y.
> 
> And it's also true under the related legal maxim (not mathematical logic) 
> of exceptio probat regulam (de rebus non exceptis).  Overuse of 
> mathematical symbolic constructs in the courts and in law makes us forget 
> that legal logic may differ substantially.  -G.

It occurs to me that R754(3) fails to establish a precedence relation
between legal and mathematical definitions.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to