I also forgot to take CFJ 2680's favoring into account.  This one was
clearly not illegal, though (I couldn't assign a favoring judge because
both were sitting, and Rule 1868 doesn't enforce favoring so strongly
as to restrict the order in which cases are assigned).

As one of the favoring parties (c.) is part of schwa's basis, I suggest
that e author its judgement.

Reply via email to