woggle wrote: > On 9/16/09 5:12 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> NoV: Justiciar woggle violated Rule 2158 (Power=2) by failing to >> assign a panel to 2670a. > > I contest this. Arguments: I reasonably believed (and still believe) > that CFJ 2670a does not exist and therefore I am not required or > permitted to assign a panel to it.
Fair enough, but can we at least get something like "I assign <panel> to CFJ 2670a (this is ineffective if it doesn't exist)"?
