Walker wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Charles Walker wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >>>> ============================== CFJ 2689 ============================== >>>> >>>> The most recent Scorekeepor's report was correct in reporting >>>> that BobTHJ revoked 3 points from ais523. >>>> >>>> ======================================================================== >>> The question in this case is whether point awards and revocations >>> before June 29 count against a contest's point limit. (The current >>> award/revacation system was adopted on this date). >>> >>> BobTHJ argues that point awards before this date do not count against >>> the then non-existent limits; Wooble's recent precedent in CFJs >>> 2686-87 seems to disagree. I concur with Wooble's arguments* in both >>> of these cases, and as they remain unappealed, I judge CFJ 2689 TRUE. >>> >>> * E discussed three possible interpretations of R2233 in eir >>> arguments, and settled on 3: A contest can reward a total number of >>> points equal to its >>> threshold limit over the life of the contest. >>> >> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this case, as the judgment does not seem >> to concur with the arguments. I recommend REMAND. > > ah, dammit. coppro is right, I meant FALSE. I support.
I support and appeal.
