ehird wrote:
> CFJ: {A player that "hard deregisters" (totally dissociating
> themselves from the game with eir R101(vii) right, as opposed to the
> action of deregistering) is a person.}
>
> Arguments: The rule paints it as a dichotomy: either you can
> R101(vii)-deregister, or you can continue to play. As a person, it's
> perfectly possible to continue to play (mostly via contracts, but
> still in a way that affects the top-level gamestate) after
> regular-deregistering. So clearly, R101(vii)-deregistering also causes
> the player to cease to be a person.
Gratuitous: Personhood is defined for those who have never played, and
similarly defined for those who have R101(vii)-stopped playing.
Proto: Replace R101(vii) with:
vii. Every player has the right to cease being a player, and
every person has the right to not be a player. The rules
may define in-game attributes of a non-player, including
obligations and penalties, but acknowledge that they
cannot force the non-player to notice.
