No NoV because BobTHJ's dealing with a new kid right now, but CFJ 2684 still hasn't had an apology submitted yet.
Related: I've fixed the CotC DB to indicate which sentences were assigned along with (or occasionally after) GUILTY, except for 2674 where woggle recused emself before re-sentencing. This also turned up the question of 2107, where woggle did not explicitly assign a sentence, arguing that re-judging GUILTY caused Wooble's original sentence to come back into effect; upon a careful reading of R1504, I think that e's right, and that we've otherwise been botching this for over two years (the paragraph defining the question on sentencing hasn't been touched since it was added in /10). I'll probably propose a retcon later this week unless someone comes up with a counterargument.
