Ed Murphy wrote:
IIRC, my interpretation was that the Dunce Cap case suffered a subtley different set of circumstances that made it not function for Dunce Caps, but such that it did function for Rests. I'm not sure, though, and would welcome a chance to review my arguments (which I haven't actually looked up) by a new CFJ.Wooble wrote:As allowed by Rule 2166, I transfer 26 Rests from myself to the Lost and Found department.I thought that was ruled not to work?
-coppro
