On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> Proto: Replace R1367's "Each player's voting limit [etc.]" with >>> >>> - The decision is ordinary. Each player's base voting limit >>> on the decision is thrice what it would have been on a >>> decision initiated at the same time on whether to adopt the >>> thesis as a proposal, plus five for each degree the voter >>> held at that time (the high limit is [etc.]). >> >> Breaks it again. The original breakage was because ordinary voting >> limits aren't defined without reference to color anymore. There's >> defined green, red, and purple limits, but no defined limit on an >> [no color specified] ordinary decision which the above proto references. > > Rule 2156 specifies that all ordinary decisions are either Green, Red, > or Purple, but its default clause assumes that there's a proposal > involved.
But what color is the hypothetical proposal used to determine what a player's base VL "would have been"? R2156 defers base VL-per-player to Rule 2279, which defines base VL for red, green, and purple, but not for a proposal in general (of unspecified color). I argued for default color green in my CFJ but that is not at all clear. -G.