Wooble wrote: > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I initiate an election to decide the holder of the Ship Computer office. I >> assume the office of Ship Computor. > > I CFJ on: "Yally is a candidate for Ship Computor." > > Arguments: This is another CFJ on ordering of actions. Both the > initiation of the election and Yally becoming the holder of the office > took place at Sun 18 Jul 23:16:02; however, the sentence indicating > the assumption of the office comes later in the public message than > the sentence initiating the election. If Yally was "the current > holder" of the office when the election was started, then e > automatically become a candidate who accepted eir nomination.
Gratuitous: Multiple actions in the same message occur in the order they were announced (usually unambiguous, and Yally's message was no exception). FALSE.
