omd wrote: > On Aug 27, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > >> omd wrote: >>> >>> NoV: Murphy violated Power-1 Rule 2224 by setting this proposal's >>> Interest Index to 0, although its effects are not limited to >>> correcting errors and/or ambiguities. >> >> I contest this NoV. The sole effect of this proposal is to repeal a >> rule with wholly ambiguous effect. > > I initiate a criminal case, setting its II to 2. A true correction would > clarify who the robot is.
Gratuitous: *interrupting* IT DOESN'T /MATTER/ WHO THE ROBOT IS!
