On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > It strikes me that when an officer ends up unresigned and inactive, the > office gets stuck. Is this right currently? Should we amend deputisation > to allow for inactive offices, not just vacant? (and are there other places > to add same, election procedure etc.)? > > [This is not to say you won't come back as soon as you can coppro, this > just made me notice the bug in general].
When an officer becomes inactive, all of eir offices become Assumed. Anyone can assume the office, and even immediately resign it if it seems likely that things will get done by deputization more efficiently when the office is empty.
