On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> 6826 P 0 3.1 coppro Quadruple Oops > AGAINST (unneeded, R1688 "Threshold defaults to the securing Rule's > Power")
It was upmutated by a different proposal.
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> 6826 P 0 3.1 coppro Quadruple Oops > AGAINST (unneeded, R1688 "Threshold defaults to the securing Rule's > Power")
It was upmutated by a different proposal.