On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 18:28 -0400, omd wrote: > CFJ: The message quoted in the evidence section caused the office of > Referee to become Postulated. > > Arguments: > > I'm guessing that that's what ais523 meant, but the wording doesn't > make a lot of sense (n.b. "I assume the Referee" does not make the > office Assumed).
It was deliberately ambiguous. -- ais523
