On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:22 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe all recursive statements should just be considered > indeterminate, regardless of how they would come out if we attempted > to break them apart?
Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified public statement consisting of the following string, followed by a quotation mark, followed by the string again, followed by another quotation mark: "Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified public statement consisting of the following string, followed by a space, followed by a quotation mark, followed by the string again, followed by another quotation mark: " —Tanner L. Swett
