On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > I appeal this verdict as it sets a bad precedent: in cases where an > Officer has contradictory duties, it is reasonable for em to choose > the lesser rules breakage, and not reasonable, in terms of the game, > for em to be essentially required to resign the whole office to avoid > the punishment. The verdict should at least include a discussion of > why resignation is more reasonable than following the intent of the > law with a (far-lesser and not substantial) rules breakage. -G.
You accepted an office whose definition is inherently flawed. You might as well become Pariah and then argue that you're being unreasonably punished by being given 23 Rests.
