Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 31, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:37 AM, <com...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The ability to submit 10,000 CFJs is not guaranteed by R101; > > Well, that's the interpretation of several players. Too bad "no > interpretation of Agoran law" is valid when it contradicts R101, > assertions to the contrary notwithstanding. Each interpretation already asserts that every other interpretation is invalid; the only way R101 makes a difference is if it causes an interpretation to invalidate *itself*, which can only happen if, according to that interpretation, a conflicting rule somehow overrules R101.
