On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >>> Since the current policy adds unnecessary complexity, amend Rule 2280 >>> (Implicit Votes) by replacing "a number of ballots equal to eir voting >>> limit on that decision" with "one hundred ballots". > > Oh, right. > > Proposal: Implicit Excess > (AI = 3, II = 1, co-author = omd, distributable via fee) > > Amend Rule 2280 (Implicit Votes) by replacing "a number of ballots > equal to eir voting limit on that decision" with "14 ballots".
14? I would understand 12, but...
