omd wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I pay fees to destroy 3 ergs in my possession. > > There's a good argument that all announcement actions are fee-based > (zero is non-negative), so this might be valid even if you didn't have > enough ergs to use the normal fee-based destruction.
I think "associate" in R2283 needs to be explicit. Also, your interpretation would imply that lots of announcement actions fail because the zero-erg fee wasn't noted.
