On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, omd wrote: > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> So, empowered by R106, which now conflicts with and numerically > >> overrules R2140 and R1688, a Proposal CAN (since November-2009) make > >> gamestate changes regardless of its power versus the secured Power of > >> the change. > > > > Complete radio silence after a judgement that we need a year-back > > recalculation? We are dead. Again. > > Yep. We really should ditch the current ruleset and start again.
Go ahead.
