On 13 April 2011 18:54, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Elliott Hird > <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On 13 April 2011 06:20, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Is there really enough ambiguity here for this CFJ to be warranted? >>> It seems more valid than most of my attempts. >> >> It's not *my* fault if someone registers in an uninteresting manner. > > Proto: In R869, replace "reasonably clearly and reasonably > unambiguously" with "reasonably unclearly and reasonably ambiguously".
FOR. Mind you, by that standard my registration was positively weary. -- Charles Walker
