All quotes are from omd: > Eh. That's stretching the definition of "content".
I concede that's possible. > Well, that's actually a pretty good argument against your > interpretation: how do you know whether some random entity can govern > the state of the game, in order to know whether it's a rule? I'm not really sure how that's relevant, but any entity which 'exists in Agora' in some sense can govern the state of the game, generally. > Most of these "restrictions" are intended to explicitly empower rules > to do things, not to restrict what might be a rule. The exceptions > are "power between one and four" and "takes the form of a text", which > aren't really that burdensome requirements. That's a good point. I interpreted lower-case "may" as "MAY generally," but that was probably wrong. > (And yes, this is a chicken and egg scenario.) Well, I don't think any interpretation is going to get rid of that problem :P Also, how do I control where in the thread I respond? I'm using mail-archive because the easiest for me to read, and omd's responses are deeper in the thread than mine are; not really sure how to control that. - Turiski
