On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 11-06-02 11:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Er, is there any actual reason it would break the game? Walker and I came
> > to
> > the conclusion that it didn't (during the proto stage) so I'd appreciate
> > more
> > than a knee-jerk "oh this might be broken" from schunt. -G.
>
> A rule that says "except as allowed by rules with power 3 or greater" would
> cause a breakage here.
Well, that's an arbitrary text that doesn't exist, it's always possible to
make one of those that breaks things; But I see you mean in that this
particular text:
"Except as
prohibited by other rules, a proposal that takes effect CAN, as
part of its effect, apply the changes that it specifies."
should be in R106 not the new power-2 rule (thought it was in one
draft).
It actually doesn't *technically* break, in that R106 sets the proposal's
power to 3 and then R1688 applies the CAN, but it means the quoted part of
the rule above is useless at power-2. Not broken, but not useful. Fair
enough.
-G.
