Walker wrote: > Judge's arguments: > R1504 requires that the initiation of a criminal case specify "a rule > allegedly violated by that action/inaction". As it is not clear that > scshunt's announcement specified such a rule, Murphy could have > reasonably believed that no criminal case was initiated and so no judge > assignment was permitted or required.
For the record, I missed the attempts until just now, but agree that they were ineffective due to not specifying which rule was violated.
